Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.invest
Subject: Re: Tandem
Message-ID: <683@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 12:44:35 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice5.683
Posted: Mon Feb 18 12:44:35 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Feb-85 05:05:22 EST
References: <380@decwrl.UUCP> <677@whuxlm.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 15

> > Although I am not intimately familar with them, it is my impression (possibly
> > incorrect) that all of the other vendors,  Stratus, Synapse, AT & T, and 
> > Sequoia (you forgot this one), provide software fault-tolerance transparently 
> > to the user.  This fact alone makes them more desireable than Tandem.  Tandem,
> > however, clearly has the advantage right now of market share, and that alone
> > may be enough to keep them on top for a very long time.
> > 
> > Ken Wilner
> > 
> > decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-quill!wilner

You forgot one, too.  Computer Consoles, Inc.  We make fault-tolereant systems
also.  And our market share is increasing!

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***