Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re:  sizeof
Message-ID: <8409@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 12:55:24 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.8409
Posted: Thu Feb 21 12:55:24 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 06:06:40 EST
References: <8006@brl-tgr.ARPA> <110@gitpyr.UUCP> <6949@watdaisy.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 9

> ....  Or, you can use a language
> that has a little bit of flexibility, and lets the compiler figure out
> such things.
> 
> These are the reasons that Pascal, despite all of its shortcomings, is
> more portable in some ways than C is.

??? Conclusion does not follow.  Please do not confuse the complaints
from people who want C to be different with what C is.