Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site homxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!homxa!aar
From: aar@homxa.UUCP (A.RAPPE)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.politics,net.legal
Subject: Re: Vet kills his baby.
Message-ID: <716@homxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 14:10:31 EST
Article-I.D.: homxa.716
Posted: Mon Feb 18 14:10:31 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Feb-85 03:22:03 EST
References: <319@cadre.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.religion:5662 net.politics:7662 net.legal:1412

I don't know what i would vote because i don't have all the facts,
but if the child was only going to live no more than three months
then he had no right to kill the child. It must have been very
traumatic for him and his wife but he has no right to judge who should
live and who should die. I'm sure someone would have adopted the child
if the parents didn't want to keep the child(only if the child lived
long enough). If it came down to judging by looks, alot of babies would
be smashed on the floor and then we would have a perfect society right?




                                            Tom