Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!jhull
From: jhull@spp2.UUCP (Jeff Hull)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Should child witnesses testify by TV?
Message-ID: <440@spp2.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 16:36:01 EST
Article-I.D.: spp2.440
Posted: Mon Feb 18 16:36:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Feb-85 02:12:19 EST
References: <164@sdcc12.UUCP> <125@tove.UUCP> <338@desint.UUCP>
Reply-To: jhull@spp2.UUCP (Jeff Hull)
Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach  CA
Lines: 16
Summary: 

In article <338@desint.UUCP> geoff@desint.UUCP (Geoff Kuenning) writes:
>If I were accused by a
>child I knew, I would want to be able to face him or her and try to
>communicate what damage he was doing to me in their confusion.

And I would want a court-appointed qualified professional to represent
your interests.  Someone who was not emotionally involved in the
outcome who could ensure that the child was protected while the truth
was being brought to light.

-- 
 Blessed Be,

 Jeff Hull            {decvax,hplabs,ihnp4,scdrdcf,ucbvax}
 13817 Yukon Ave.         trwrb!trwspp!spp2!jhull
 Hawthorne, CA 90250