Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site vice.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!winkg From: winkg@vice.UUCP (Wink Gross) Newsgroups: net.music.classical Subject: Re: cd vs. bso Message-ID: <83@vice.UUCP> Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 21:13:10 EST Article-I.D.: vice.83 Posted: Mon Feb 18 21:13:10 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 23-Feb-85 09:27:49 EST References: <24bc5f1f.2a75@apollo.uucp> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 43 > On the whole I do prefer CD to BSO reproduction > techniques. There are advantages to both of course, but in the CD's favor > I note the following: > > [etc.] > > Tom Gross > Apollo Computer, Inc. > You Bostonians make me sick. You have one of the world's top five (?) orchestras in one of the world's top three (?) concert halls and you'd rather sit home eating TV dinners listening to your CDs. I'll bet you have the TV on watching the Celtics at the same time. Live music does have a few advantages: 1. The visual impression is an important part of the experience. That's why I like to sit near the front. Not to mention, Ofra Harnoy makes a much bigger impression "on stage" than "in speaker". 2. Watching the orchestra (or whatever) lets you pick up on "bits" in the music that might otherwise be missed. 3. You get to hear stuff you wouldn't dream of buying. That has to be good for you. 4. In Boston's Symphony Hall (alas, in few others) the vibrations coming from the armrests through your hands and from the floor through the soles of your feet add an extra sensation you don't usually get in your home. On the other hand, for me, live opera is a drag. I much prefer opera on film, with subtitles. The last act of most live opera is strictly eyelid-prop time. Especially if they've had 3 half-hour intermissions before. Now that everyone's heard from the Gross brothers, anybody else care to comment? Wink Gross Tektronix, Inc.