Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mgweed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!mgnetp!mgweed!rjk
From: rjk@mgweed.UUCP (Randy King)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Can we nuke "Re: Orphaned Response" please?
Message-ID: <15629@mgweed.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 21:19:17 EST
Article-I.D.: mgweed.15629
Posted: Fri Feb 22 21:19:17 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 20:27:48 EST
References: <199@ihlpg.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Consumer Products - Montgomery Illinois
Lines: 10

<><><>

I agree, but what the heck - I just don't bother reading them.  And
I know a bunch of people that do the same.  So those of you "notes"
folks that let the "orpahned response" stuff go out, it would be
just about as effective as "cat article > /dev/null."

						Randy King
						AT&T-CP@MG
						ihnp4!mgweed!rjk