Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!hao!noao!terak!doug
From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Underlying Structure of Words
Message-ID: <382@terak.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 14:13:57 EST
Article-I.D.: terak.382
Posted: Mon Feb 18 14:13:57 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Feb-85 08:45:11 EST
References: <406@cadovax.UUCP>
Organization: Terak Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Lines: 6

> "-able" is more tightly bound to "employ" than "un-" is. Is this
> because "employable" is a word and "unemploy" is not? (Or is it?)

So what about "notwithstanding"?
-- 
Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{hao,ihnp4,decvax}!noao!terak!doug