Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!utastro!bill
From: bill@utastro.UUCP (William H. Jefferys)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Creation / Evolution Debate
Message-ID: <1023@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Feb-85 17:08:42 EST
Article-I.D.: utastro.1023
Posted: Fri Feb 15 17:08:42 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Feb-85 05:35:55 EST
References: <32500023@uiucdcsb.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 24

> 
> 1) ICR is not, and never has been, a membership organization.  Hence, any
> discussion by the evolutionists of membership qualifications/characteristics
> is moot.

The original writer mentioned both the CRS and the ICR.  Ray is correct
that the ICR does not have a requirement that members sign a statement;
it is the CRS that does.  This does not affect the truth of the original
writer's assertion that both the CRS and ICR are patently religious
organizations.

By the way, Ray, while you have Duane Gish in tow, see if you can get
a straight answer out of him on his claims about the similarities between
human and bullfrog blood proteins.  A reference to the scientific
literature backing up his amazing claims will suffice.  Betcha you can't!

-- 
"Men never do evil so cheerfully and so completely as when they do so from
	religious conviction."  -- Blaise Pascal

	Bill Jefferys  8-%
	Astronomy Dept, University of Texas, Austin TX 78712   (USnail)
	{allegra,ihnp4}!{ut-sally,noao}!utastro!bill	(uucp)
	bill%utastro.UTEXAS@ut-sally.ARPA		(ARPANET)