Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp internal release 1.2; site hplabs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!iles
From: iles@hplabs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Radar (Speed Detection)
Message-ID: <18600006@hplabs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 10-Feb-85 13:16:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hplabs.18600006
Posted: Sun Feb 10 13:16:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 17-Feb-85 08:42:01 EST
References: <3008@allegra.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:allegra:-300800:hplabs:18600006:000:668
Nf-From: hplabs!iles    Feb 16 10:16:00 1985

It appears that you are going to fight a traffic ticket.

Radar tickets are the easiest tickets to beat, especially
if you know more about physics that the officer.

Check out a little black book called (drumroll please)
...How to win in traffic court.  Your library should have it.

The best defense in a radar case is "inability to perceive."

Just remember, traffic law is a code of strict liability.  NEVER
admit you were speeding at all.  Mitigating circumstances only
apply when sentencing.  There is no "Justafiable speeding."

Good Luck.

Dan "Yeah, the traffic court judge knows me by name, now" Lieman
iles%hplabs.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
!hplvla!hplabs!iles