Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site tty3b.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!tty3b!mjk From: mjk@tty3b.UUCP (Mike Kelly) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Wage Rates: Unions, Minimum Wage Laws, and Employer Oligopoly Message-ID: <602@tty3b.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Feb-85 10:08:35 EST Article-I.D.: tty3b.602 Posted: Fri Feb 15 10:08:35 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 17-Feb-85 05:14:22 EST References: <811@ratex.UUCP> <593@tty3b.UUCP> <1080@amdahl.UUCP> <595@tty3b.UUCP> <710@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> Organization: Teletype Corp., Skokie, Ill Lines: 25 Yes, I do have a counter proposal. It is not only mine, but has been discussed many times in Congress, usually initiated by the Congressional Black Caucus, who have a great interest in unemployment due to the incredibly high unemployment rates among American Blacks (at least double the white rate, and often worse). We should make a significant cut in defense spending, somewhere between 25% and 50%. The tax code should be reformed to tax all income, regardless of source, and impose a single high floor, somewhere around $15,000. These two actions together would seriously address the deficit (which, despite his pious claims to the contrary, Ronald Reagan has been the single biggest contributor to with his outlandish defense budgets.) A good portion (around $80 billion) of the remaining money should be dedicated to a massive public works program in the U.S. Roads and bridges need to be rebuilt. The train system needs new right-of-ways. Mass transit should be built in areas where it is needed. Approached properly, this is not only an opportunity to provide much needed repairs to America's infrastructure, but also a significant opportunity to train people in these jobs. Why don't we do this? Certainly not because it costs too much. We're spending four times as much on the military. Certainly not because we can't afford it; can we "afford" unemployment and misery for 10% of our people? No, it's just a lack of political will to address the problem.