Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: net.religion.christian & Rich Rosen
Message-ID: <4796@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 14-Feb-85 09:11:19 EST
Article-I.D.: cbscc.4796
Posted: Thu Feb 14 09:11:19 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 05:33:31 EST
References: <5030@utzoo.UUCP> <1126@amdahl.UUCP>, <535@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories <SCCS>, Columbus
Lines: 24

>> I created net.religion.christian and at that time I emphasized
>> it is not net.flame.christian.  The official description says
>> it is for "discussion" of Christianity (distinguished from "debate").
>> 
>> So, if all this makes any difference, I don't think net.religion.christian
>> was intended for pro-/anti-Christian debates but for Christians to discuss
>> their religious diversity among themselves. [GORDON MOFFETT]
>
>Others would disagree (see Laura Creighton's article for one).  It would
>seem that teleological arguments regarding the purpose/intention of
>net.religion.christian are seemingly contradictory and invalid.  :-)
>[Rich Rosen]

See Laura Creighton's more recent article, Rich.  She suggested moving
you.  How about net.religion.rosen?

So who are the ones who disagree with Gordon's idea of what
net.religion.christian if for?  Not Christians, it seems.
Who's going to dictate?
-- 

Paul Dubuc	cbscc!pmd
... or is it Paul DuBois?  No, my birth certificate says... right
here... "P-a-u-l D-u-b-u-c".  I'm no longer confused... I think.