Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site hocsi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!ahuta!hocsi!oft From: oft@hocsi.UUCP (o.a.faco) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.politics,net.legal Subject: Re: Vet kills his baby. Message-ID: <107@hocsi.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 10:29:32 EST Article-I.D.: hocsi.107 Posted: Tue Feb 19 10:29:32 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Feb-85 06:46:21 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 38 Xref: watmath net.religion:5671 net.politics:7684 net.legal:1414 Reference: <319@cadre.ARPA> Would it be correct to make assumptions? If yes: I'm assuming that the vet's wife underwent tests to deduce the health of the fetus, and so on. If this is true, the doctor should have at least found that the child was having problems. At this point, I'm assuming the doctor told the patient that there were/weren't problems. If he didn't tell her, he's in some trouble. If he did tell her, did she tell her husband? If she did, then he murdered his child. If she didn't, she's just as guilty. Now, if the fetal tests were done during the whole pregnancy, would signs of the illness have shown themselves in time for an abortion or possibly some medical aid? If so, and the parents took no affirmative steps, then they both killed their child. My feelings would be to try to get the child's problems solved. Through medical research, as a 'guinea pig' (even though it sounds awful) if there was no chance otherwise. If no: I wouldn't know if I'd react in the following way. I would not have smashed the kid's head onto the floor. I would have tried to raise the kid for the three months, and if he lived longer than that, I would consider operations to correct as many of his problems as possible. These events could also be deemed an educational/experimental experience. Where new procedures could be tested, and so on. In either case, I would not have killed him. Olga Faco Fudd and Fuddett forever.