Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!sjuvax!iannucci From: iannucci@sjuvax.UUCP (iannucci) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Why does SHE believe... Message-ID: <877@sjuvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 20-Feb-85 14:54:41 EST Article-I.D.: sjuvax.877 Posted: Wed Feb 20 14:54:41 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 03:37:10 EST Reply-To: iannucci@sjuvax.UUCP (iannucci) Organization: St. Josephs University, Phila. PA. Lines: 45 In article <329@teklds.UUCP> larryg@teklds.UUCP (Karen Clark) writes: > >There is only one reason and ONE REASON ONLY to believe in Jesus. > She's really right, you know. >I have met Him and talked to Him and experienced HIM in my life. > >Everything else outside of experiential knowledge is falling short >of a true relationship with God and obviously will not stand up to >attack. > >karen Tell us what he's like, Karen. I'm not being a wise-ass either. I think that anyone who has been in the presence of the Almighty should share that experience with others. What does he look like? What did you talk to him about? "Well, I didn't actually *meet* him. That's just a figure of speech." [PREDICTED RESPONSE] Then what WAS the experience, and how can you defend yourself against a charge that what you encountered was not, in fact, a transcendent Otherness, but only a projection of your mind? I realize that these are not new arguments, but I'd be interested to know what you have to say. I will concur with you that to believe in [God,Jesus] for any other reason than personal experience is reprehensible. But I question the validity of the experience. -- David J. Iannucci (the dirty vicar) St. Joseph's University {allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!iannucci Philadelphia "A witty saying proves nothing. " --Voltaire =============================================================================