Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cvl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!cvl!rlh From: rlh@cvl.UUCP (Ralph L. Hartley) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: What? Message-ID: <66@cvl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 10:39:10 EST Article-I.D.: cvl.66 Posted: Thu Feb 21 10:39:10 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 06:45:00 EST Organization: Computer Vision Lab, U. of Maryland, College Park Lines: 41 > Consider the following statements: > > A. God created men in his own image. > B. Ubizmo created men in his own image. > C. Men created God in own image. > D. Men created Ubizmo in his own image. > > Which statement is 'true'? You may believe that the first statement > is the correct one. (Rich will probably disagree, claiming that the > second statement is the correct one). I cannot 'prove' that > statements A or B are false. yet, statements A and B seem to mutually > contradict each other, whereas statements C and D are not inconsistent > with each other. My rationalization is that statements C and D are > more likely to describe the situation. A => ~B B => ~A Therefore C & D ???? Run that by me again. > The above discussion is an oversimplification of *my* thought process, I hope so! > but it may give you an idea how non-religious person judges issues of faith. Maybe some non-religious people. If there really are such people. Everyone has a religion of some kind. Even Rich Rosen has a religion of sorts. If he dosn't, why does he spend his entire waking life posting to the net? That is, if he realy exists. I remain unconvinced. I think it more likely that his rather voluminous postings are the work of an entire materialist society posting under a common pen name. Or perhaps he is a supernatural being (Ubizmo?) who has gotton onto the net somehow. Ubizmo loves us so naturaly he wants to decieve us, right? :-) Ralph Hartley siesmo!rlgvax!cvl!rlh rlh@cvl.ARPA