Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amdcad!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: modern Christianity's lack of responses to Boswell
Message-ID: <5036@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 13:01:48 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.5036
Posted: Fri Feb 22 13:01:48 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Feb-85 02:49:50 EST
References: <4935@fortune.UUCP> <4720@cbscc.UUCP> <278@bbnccv.UUCP> <343@teklds.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 22
Summary: 

In article <343@teklds.UUCP> larryg@teklds.UUCP (Karen Clark) writes:
>If God wanted homosexual relationships then why do people have to
>change their body surgically.  This is an obvious statement that
>God didn't do it right.  To men and two women physically are
>not made for each other.
>
>karen

Those who surgically change their bodies from one sex to another are
not necessarily homosexuals.  In fact, I know of several cases that
have only become homosexual *after* their operations.  And as for your
contention that (I assume you meant "two men" rather than "to men")
men are not physically made for each other, I can assure you that that
is definately not true... I will not speak for women, but several whom
I have met seem to feel that two women are made for each other.

This particular argument probabally doesn't belong in n.r.c, but you
posted your original lies here and I wanted to make sure that they
were challenged before the same audience.
-- 
Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower