Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site lcuxc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!lcuxc!kenw
From: kenw@lcuxc.UUCP (K Wolman)
Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish
Subject: Halacha as Misnomer?
Message-ID: <306@lcuxc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Feb-85 08:20:05 EST
Article-I.D.: lcuxc.306
Posted: Tue Feb 26 08:20:05 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Feb-85 12:53:24 EST
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway, NJ
Lines: 23

References: <16@unc.UUCP> <3780010@csd2.UUCP> <874@cbdkc1.UUCP>, <502@sfmag.UUCP> <273@lcuxc.UUCP>
>
>> Would you perhaps like to inform some of us well-intentioned
>> people of the "extent of the misnomer," i.e., Conservatism using
>> the term "halacha"?  Try if possible to avoid the comments about
>> driving to shul on Saturday; counting women in a minyan; and the
>> RA's admission of women rabbis to membership.  I for one would
>> like to hear some new variations.  I'd like to know a bit more
>> about how I imperil my share of the Olam Haba by davening on
>> Shabbos in a Conservative shul (not temple).

> The misnomer is roughly similar to calling your remarks "well-intentioned".

				Y.S.


That's not an answer.
-- 
Ken Wolman
Bell Communications Research @ Livingston
lcuxc!kenw

"Maybe, and that's final!"