Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site wlcrjs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie
From: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: Ann Landers Survey
Message-ID: <569@wlcrjs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 14-Feb-85 14:27:23 EST
Article-I.D.: wlcrjs.569
Posted: Thu Feb 14 14:27:23 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 06:12:48 EST
References: <1117@pyuxa.UUCP> <55@osu-eddie.UUCP> <2261@randvax.UUCP> <1059@opus.UUCP>
Reply-To: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.women:4458 net.singles:5866
Summary: 

In article <1059@opus.UUCP> rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) writes:
>> > > How about it, netters (male and female)? - Which do you prefer:
>> > > 1) Sex, 2) a hug, 3) reading Ann Landers, 4) none of the above (for Jeff :-)
>> ...
>> If I could choose only one, I'd choose hugs over sex, too.  Sex without
>> hugs is almost unthinkable!...
>
>OK, so remember the Big Chill?  Which do you prefer--sex or
>rationalizations?  How long can YOU go without a rationalization?
>-- 
>Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
>   ...Never offend with style when you can offend with substance.

Sex  with hugs might be called promiscuity.

Sex without hugs might be paid for in advance.

===============================================================================
From the mostly vacant environment of  Jeanette L. Zobjeck (ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie)

All opinions expressed may not even be my own.
===============================================================================