Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.taxes,net.singles,net.flame
Subject: Re: Marriage penalty
Message-ID: <615@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Feb-85 13:09:54 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.615
Posted: Wed Feb 20 13:09:54 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Feb-85 20:07:44 EST
References: <285@calmasd.UUCP> <2297@mit-hermes.ARPA> <428@lsuc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.taxes:695 net.singles:5912 net.flame:8462

> In article <2297@mit-hermes.ARPA> jpexg@mit-hermes.ARPA (John Purbrick) writes
> ||	The couple who got divorced each year ended up losing their case; there
> ||is a law that any transaction clearly intended primarily to reduce taxes is 
> ||necessarily invalid.
  
     Under that definition, why wouldn't opening an IRA or buying tax-exempt
bonds be illegal?
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
     "Have SEX with a beautiful, LIVE girl!"  - from a pamphlet from the church
						of the subgenius.