Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxw.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihuxw!kalm
From: kalm@ihuxw.UUCP (James )
Newsgroups: net.taxes,net.singles,net.flame
Subject: Re: Marriage penalty and Michael Esco
Message-ID: <1061@ihuxw.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 00:10:23 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxw.1061
Posted: Fri Feb 22 00:10:23 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Feb-85 02:36:26 EST
References: <285@calmasd.UUCP> <429@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 17
Xref: linus net.taxes:576 net.singles:4922 net.flame:7490

> There is no such thing as a marriage penalty. The penalty is against single
> people, and has been for as long as I've been paying taxes.
> 
> 						Michael Esco
> 						Boeing Aerospace

Obviously Mr. Esco is suffering from the delusion that two
(and their dependents) can live as cheaply as one.
I suspect that his opinion will change some day, unless he is
a confirmed bachelor.
I must take his contribution to the net as seriously as I take
the Schedule W to be a solution to the problem.
-- 
Jim Kalmadge -  AT&T Bell Labs IH 4b409
8-367-4325
(312) 979-4325
ihuxw!kalm