Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!decwrl!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ix200
From: ix200@sdcc6.UUCP (Bruce Jones)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: heterosex
Message-ID: <1922@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Feb-85 00:44:39 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.1922
Posted: Wed Feb 20 00:44:39 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 03:46:45 EST
References: <514@hou5g.UUCP> <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> <450@ahuta.UUCP>
Reply-To: ix200@sdcc6.UUCP (Bruce Jones)
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 24
Summary: 

In article <450@ahuta.UUCP> ecl@ahuta.UUCP (e.leeper) writes:
>REFERENCES:  <514@hou5g.UUCP>, <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP>
>
>> Fortunately for reason, the sheer numerical superiority of
>> heterosexuality shows the absurdity of the thing for what it is.
>> 
>> Charley Wingate   umcp-cs!mangoe
>> 
>
>If sheer numerical superiority is what Wingate thinks makes something right,
>then why doesn't he have a sex change operation?  I mean, if 51% of the
>population is female, it must be right.  Right?
>
>And in case you haven't guessed, :-).
>
>					Evelyn C. Leeper
>					...{ihnp4, houxm, hocsj}!ahuta!ecl

Wrong. The way I read this, Mr.Wingate is saying that numerical superiority
demonstrates absurdity.  

(How do you make the doubly happy face?)   

Bruce Jones