Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf
From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: heterosex
Message-ID: <361@ccice6.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 17:17:33 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice6.361
Posted: Thu Feb 21 17:17:33 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 20:09:10 EST
References: <514@hou5g.UUCP>, <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> <450@ahuta.UUCP>
Organization: The Wall Of Fog
Lines: 28

> > Well, enough of this.  I can only read this "questionnaire" as an attempt
> > to make people who feel a moral repugnance towards the PRACTICE of 
> > homosexuality to feel guilty.  By inverting a number of serious questions
> > concerning homosexuality, the author attempts to make the original questions
> > look rediculous.  Fortunately for reason, the sheer numerical superiority of
> > heterosexuality shows the absurdity of the thing for what it is.
> > 
> > Charley Wingate   umcp-cs!mangoe
> > 

> If sheer numerical superiority is what Wingate thinks makes something right,
> then why doesn't he have a sex change operation?  I mean, if 51% of the
> population is female, it must be right.  Right?
> 
> And in case you haven't guessed, :-).
> 
>                                       Evelyn C. Leeper

Evelyn, you are too kind. Fools must be dealt with harsely or they don't
learn. Your statement made as much sense at the first one. Fortunately for
reason, the sheer numerical superiority of sensible comments shows the
absurdity of the thing called Wingate.
-- 
The Watcher

seismo!rochester!ccice5!ccice6!daf
	    or
allegra!rochester!ccice5!ccice6!daf