Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-gr.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!pwa-b!utah-gr!haas From: haas@utah-gr.UUCP (Walt Haas) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: More thoughts on committment and marriage Message-ID: <1357@utah-gr.UUCP> Date: Thu, 21-Feb-85 15:31:19 EST Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1357 Posted: Thu Feb 21 15:31:19 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 20:40:36 EST Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept Lines: 75 [bugfodder] I keep coming back to Greg's comment about the people who get divorced instead of trying to save their marriage. I am close to a couple who just split up, with intent to divorce, and I can't help but be struck by how much they have in common and how much they could learn from each other. In a way it is really tragic that they are splitting up rather than learning to deal with each other better. This is the second divorce for each of them, and they have no kids from this (or the previous) marriage, so they tend to think of divorce as a fairly easy solution. They each have problems in the way they communicate with others that make it hard for them to establish good stable relationships. As far as I can see, they can only solve these problems by going through a process of learning better communication methods and, perhaps more important, learning how to accept others as they are and still get their own needs met. The problem that I am wrestling with is, can they go through this relearning process better with each other, or with somebody else? The arguments in favor of staying together and learning from each other are that they have very similar values and interests in most areas. The arguments in favor of splitting up are: She wants kids and he doesn't (but she'll have to find a father in the next few years, as she is now 31.6); they have reached a point of mutual anger and rejection that makes it hard for them to talk to each other; and, perhaps most important, they tend to mutually aggravate each other's communication problems. Incidentally, she claims that he went through a switch from his single man script to his married man script when they got married. She refers to this as "bait and switch". When pressed, she will admit that after a year of marriage she stopped accepting his lifestyle and some features of his personality. In general I think that for them divorce is probably the better solution, for the following reasons: 1) I think there is more potential for them to learn as individuals than as a couple, because they tend to aggravate each other's communication problems. 2) In order for them to learn as a couple, they both need to make a committment to change at the same time, in a compatible direction. This has to start with a mutual admission that they both have a problem which requires change. This type of mutual admission is real hard to get and stick to. 3) As individuals, they are freer to interact with people who don't fall automatically into the expected roles. This can potentially lead to more learning experiences. Unfortunately, they are also freer to pretend their problems don't exist. 4) In a situation where one wants to change and the other doesn't, the one who wants to change is constantly pushed back into the accustomed role and prevented from learning new ways to deal with problems. 5) Even in a situation where both want to change, the direction and timing of one's change might or might not support the other's change. Changing in unison is hard to coordinate, especially for people who have trouble communicating anyway. This could probably be helped by good outside support, say a marriage counselor or the equivalent. As you no doubt deduced from the tentative tone in which I stated my conclusion, I'm interested in hearing evidence to invalidate it. In particular, what types of situation might overcome the arguments in favor of my friends splitting up? Regards -- Walt Haas uucp: ...decvax!utah-cs!haas ARPA: HAAS@UTAH-20