Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mit-eddie!bandy
From: bandy@mit-eddie.UUCP (++Andrew Scott Beals)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: !married vs ~married
Message-ID: <3694@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Feb-85 06:27:48 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.3694
Posted: Mon Feb 25 06:27:48 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Feb-85 06:24:35 EST
References: <3689@mit-eddie.UUCP> <774@topaz.ARPA>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 22

>From: sommers@topaz.ARPA (Liz Sommers)
>Who do you consider married?  Who do you consider eligible for this group?
>Are Mike and I eligible?  Or is our relationship so far off the norm as to 
>not count as single OR married?  Is net.singles only for rampant, yearning
>heterosexuals?

For all my flammage earlier this am, you two fit into the !married category.
Living together (or spending majority of non-working ('free') time together,
not really worrying whether or not your a[mf]p is going to even want to 
speak to you ever again... You two are "together for the duration". This
is not quite the whole and complete idea of what I meant but I hope that
you understand...

>Should we start sending "Ask mamaliz" to net.singles?

Hey, why not? Bet you'd have more fun and get better questions than you
got when you asked [censored]@ht...

slightly jello,
	andy
arpa: bandy@lll-crg
uucp: {ihnp4!mit-eddie,sun!lll-crg}!bandy