Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nmtvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!unm-cvax!nmtvax!brooke
From: brooke@nmtvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Marriage penalty
Message-ID: <293@nmtvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 19:49:27 EST
Article-I.D.: nmtvax.293
Posted: Fri Feb 22 19:49:27 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Feb-85 01:20:11 EST
References: <285@calmasd.UUCP> <429@ssc-vax.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: brooke@nmtvax.UUCP (J. Brooke King)
Organization: New Mexico Tech, Socorro
Lines: 17
Summary: 

Please:  No more taxation discussions in net.singles.  Put them in
net.taxes ONLY.  I read both net.taxes and net.singles, but I am no more
inclined to read about taxes in net.singles than I am to read about
dealing with parents about SO's or finding good places to dance in
net.taxes.  Get the picture?  Many of you probably did not notice
net.singles in the headers of your followups so I am not flaming you.  I
just want everyone to be more careful.  You can flame me all you want by
mail about THIS article's inappropriateness for net.singles.
-- 

                                 J. Brooke King                         
                                 ... ucbvax!unmvax!nmtvax!brooke

Any viewpoints expressed herein are my own and not necessarily those of
the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.

P.S.  Was this message intelligible?  Really?  They usually aren't.