Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ellie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!rocksvax!rocksanne!sunybcs!ellie!uglahren
From: uglahren@ellie.UUCP (James A. Lahren)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Re: net.singles.christian
Message-ID: <319@ellie.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 24-Feb-85 17:36:35 EST
Article-I.D.: ellie.319
Posted: Sun Feb 24 17:36:35 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Feb-85 11:20:35 EST
References: <1340@utah-gr.UUCP>
Organization: State University of New York @ Buffalo,NY
Lines: 33

> This would seem like a good newsgroup for all these discussions
> of exactly what the Bible may mean about divorce, sex or whatever.
> I personally couldn't care less.  I suspect most Christians wouldn't
> want to be bothered with detailed discussions of how many wives are
> permitted by the Koran or the Book of Mormon.  In my opinion the
> spirit of deciding which newsgroup to post to should be, "Does this
> really have any interest outside the group of those who share my
> particular religious beliefs?".
> 
> Regards  -- Walt Haas
> 
> uucp:  ...decvax!utah-cs!haas
> ARPA:  HAAS@UTAH-20

************************

	What Walt says here is right, but many seem unable to follow this
	advice..

	Net.singles is for singles.  Likewise, there is a net.micro for micro's,	and a net.micro.atari for discussions pertaining to atari's...

	It seems only reasonable to break up net.singles into either a
	net.singles.religion, or even better a net.religion.singles...

	I am not trying to say that religion is not important, but only that
	this is not the proper forum for a religious analysis of a problem..

	Once and for all, why don't we solve this problem......              

        -jim lahren

        uucp: ...decvax!sunybcs!uglahren