Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/21/84; site styx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!decwrl!sun!idi!styx!mcb From: mcb@styx.UUCP (Michael C. Berch) Newsgroups: net.legal,net.taxes Subject: Re: Abuse of social contracts. (tax system) Message-ID: <110@styx.UUCP> Date: Thu, 14-Feb-85 00:08:25 EST Article-I.D.: styx.110 Posted: Thu Feb 14 00:08:25 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 05:29:47 EST References: <2748@dartvax.UUCP> <445@ahuta.UUCP> <399@lsuc.UUCP> Organization: Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA Lines: 34 Xref: watmath net.legal:1399 net.taxes:661 In article <399@lsuc.UUCP> dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) writes: > ... A fixed percentage causes hardship for those with > low incomes. The progressive system of brackets and marginal > rates is perceived as the "fairest", and is used in both the > U.S. and Canada. Perceived by whom? I can't agree. There is something democratically satisfying about the idea that both moreAAND less fortunate people pay the same percentage of their gross income to the government to support its basic services. I think there is even economic justification for a "regressive" tax, e.g. 20% on the first $15,000, 15% on the next $30,000, etc., on the grounds that higher-income people simply don't consume government services at a linearly-proportional rate. Does a person earning $100,000/yr consume FIVE TIMES as much tax-supported public services (police/fire/school/defense/ environment/etc.) than a person earning $20,000? No way. Yet he will pay (without cheating or abusive shelters) more than five times as much tax. Now I don't think that a regressive tax is likely to be enacted, but a flat tax would at least be a step in the correct direction. Once we get away from the idea that taxes should be used to redistribute the national income and achieve broad policy objectives, and return to the original justification for taxes, which is to provide revenue to run the government on, I'll pay my share with a smile. Michael C. Berch {akgua,ihnp4,sun}!idi!lll-tis!mcb ...!idi!styx!mcb mcb@lll-tis.ARPA