Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!cottrell@nbs-vms.ARPA From: cottrell@nbs-vms.ARPA Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: h,j,k,l in vi Message-ID: <8242@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Mon, 11-Feb-85 16:31:43 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.8242 Posted: Mon Feb 11 16:31:43 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 03:46:34 EST Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 20 /* > In article <8035@brl-tgr.ARPA> cottrell@nbs-vms.ARPA writes: > >VI is much more capable than RE. The keys all have mnemonic names, > >d for delete, w for word, i for insert, etc. > > h for left, j for up, k for down, l for RIGHT!?!?. Really mnemonic names, > those. Almost as slick as zilch, which uses u for down. Being of the emacs > religion, I won't mention the multitude of missing features that editors > really need; I'll just pray that I never, ever have to use the rand editor > if what you say about it is true. Sounds like it could actually be *worse* > than scope. > >