Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site gloria.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!rocksvax!rocksanne!sunybcs!gloria!colonel
From: colonel@gloria.UUCP (George Sicherman)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Strip Searches
Message-ID: <902@gloria.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 9-Feb-85 23:44:29 EST
Article-I.D.: gloria.902
Posted: Sat Feb  9 23:44:29 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Feb-85 04:17:04 EST
References: <604@unmvax.UUCP> <114@bridge2.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: SUNY-Buffalo Computer Sci.
Lines: 19

> A person convicted of a crime and sentenced to prison loses certain
> rights. Among these lost rights is the right to privacy. I have no
> sympathy. If you behave as an animal you should not complain about
> being treated as one. After all, we are talking about San Quentin,
> not detention hall after school.

Where's my oxy-acetylene torch?  Now, then ...

1. The question being debated is not whether a convict loses the
	right of privacy, but whether she ought to lose it.

2. You do not know the difference between a criminal and an animal.

3. The only objective truth in your article is the statement "I
	have no sympathy." It is all the commentary you needed to
	make.
-- 
Col. G. L. Sicherman
...decvax!sunybcs!gloria!colonel