Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utcsri.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!west
From: west@utcsri.UUCP (Thomas L. West)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: San Quentin strip searches -- a new twist
Message-ID: <773@utcsri.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Feb-85 21:43:18 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsri.773
Posted: Fri Feb 15 21:43:18 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Feb-85 00:23:28 EST
References: <3365@alice.UUCP> <2295@randvax.UUCP> <951@watdcsu.UUCP>
Reply-To: west@utcsri.UUCP (Thomas L. West)
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 17
Summary: 

David Canzi writes:
>No amount of injustice against women can justify any injustice against
>men.  In fact, as a general principle, no amount of injustice against
>"x" can justify any injustice against "y".

  Hmm.  Why is it that people who make statements like the above are always
in group "y"?

  There is *always* going to be some injustice.  Why not even out the load
a little?  That way, *everybody* has some incentive to help solve the 
injustices.

  Besides, one could always argue that it's "y" causing the injustice against
"x".

    Tom West
 { allegra cornell decvax ihnp4 linus utzoo }!utcsrgv!west