Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!wjh12!foxvax1!brunix!browngr!jfh
From: jfh@browngr.UUCP (John "Spike" Hughes)
Newsgroups: net.books,net.women
Subject: Re: Pornography doesn't degrade women ...
Message-ID: <1836@browngr.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Feb-85 10:11:23 EST
Article-I.D.: browngr.1836
Posted: Fri Feb  8 10:11:23 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Feb-85 06:17:09 EST
References: cbosgd.800, <243@looking.UUCP> <11300010@smu.UUCP> <4560@cbscc.UUCP> <354@ahuta.
Lines: 7
Xref: watmath net.books:1450 net.women:4481


   On the issue of free speech: I think that one of the Supreme court rulings on
pornnogrphy (or perhaps some other free-speech or right issue) stated, roughly,
that these rights are easy to grant to the poeple whose ideas we condone,
but the function of the laws and the duty of the courts was to preserve those
rights precisely for those with whom we most vehemently disagree.
   I beg you to ask yourself, "Why did they say this?"