Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/28/84; site lll-crg.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!gymble!lll-crg!muffy
From: muffy@lll-crg.ARPA (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: San Quentin strip searches -- a new twist
Message-ID: <397@lll-crg.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 19-Feb-85 02:06:14 EST
Article-I.D.: lll-crg.397
Posted: Tue Feb 19 02:06:14 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Feb-85 05:18:35 EST
References: <3365@alice.UUCP> <2295@randvax.UUCP> <951@watdcsu.UUCP> <773@utcsri.UUCP>
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, CRG group
Lines: 19

> David Canzi writes:
> >No amount of injustice against women can justify any injustice against
> >men.  In fact, as a general principle, no amount of injustice against
> >"x" can justify any injustice against "y".
> 
>   Hmm.  Why is it that people who make statements like the above are always
> in group "y"?
>     Tom West
>  { allegra cornell decvax ihnp4 linus utzoo }!utcsrgv!west

Umm....I suppose I'm in *a* group "y," since women seem to qualify.  How-
ever, I am not in *all* groups "y," and I certainly agree with the
original posting.  "Revenge" for injustice just *shifts* the injustice.
What should be done is to get *rid* of it...but I'm just a silly, ideal-
istic fool who doesn't understand why people are divided up in such
strange ways...

			 Muffy