Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ames.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amd!dual!ames!barry From: barry@ames.UUCP (Kenn Barry) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: How to start getting rid of porn Message-ID: <808@ames.UUCP> Date: Wed, 20-Feb-85 14:34:02 EST Article-I.D.: ames.808 Posted: Wed Feb 20 14:34:02 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Feb-85 14:31:07 EST References: <1612@pur-phy.UUCP> <4716@cbscc.UUCP> <128@v1.UUCP> <774@utcsri.UUCP> Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 24 > But back to the article being rebutted. While liberalizing laws concerning >what happens to two individuals in the privacy of their home is something I'm >in favour of, I don't think that the legalization of prostitution is likely to >help attitudes much at all. We *are* North Americans, and as such, we are >unlikely to view prostitution as an honourable or sacred profession. To >legalize it would just make it more widespread and likely hurt attitudes >towards women in general (remember that given our background, the vast majority >of the population looks down upon prostitution and this *isn't* going to change >with legalization). Seems to me this is a self-perpetuating attitude. If you keep prostitution illegal, then hookers will of course continue to have no social standing, and little legal protection against exploitation and abuse. I would agree that the main problem is that most people look down on prostitutes, but maybe it would be better if we tried to change such attitudes. Is such contempt not sexist? Are hookers not one of the groups most victimized by sexism? Is prostitution a problem, or is the problem the suppression of prostitution? - From the Crow's Nest - Kenn Barry NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- USENET: {ihnp4,vortex,dual,hao,menlo70,hplabs}!ames!barry