Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
From: chabot@amber.DEC (l s chabot)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Will the real Ken Arndt please post to the correct newsgroup
Message-ID: <688@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 14:14:58 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.688
Posted: Fri Feb 22 14:14:58 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Feb-85 02:55:12 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 14

So what if the article was written by a woman: does this mean that only 
abortions should post to net.abortion?  Whoever wrote the article you quoted,
it doesn't matter, it was about abortion, and if you wish to then
refer to it, you could just as well carry on your discussion and refer us to
net.abortion for the text.

Frankly, these arguments about some overwhelming majority of women seeing the
light and loudly advocating a return to traditional values aren't convincing.
At least not to join *them*.  Time to get out the checkbook ...

L S Chabot
UUCP:	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA:	...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
USFail:    DEC, LMO4/H4, 150 Locke Drive, Marlborough, MA  01752