Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers
From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers
Subject: Re: Some rebuttals
Message-ID: <939@uw-beaver>
Date: Wed, 20-Mar-85 15:57:49 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.939
Posted: Wed Mar 20 15:57:49 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Mar-85 00:39:26 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 15

From: Nick <NNicoll.ES@XEROX.ARPA>

I think the answer to the font list problem is a trivial one of font
'name' conventions.  If families of faces carry the same name, then a
reasonable printer could do font substitutions and produce a reasonable
printout.  Perhaps the right margin would not be perfectly justified
because of different Kerning, etc. between the font specified and the
one actually used but if the printer knew it could substitute a Titan10
for a TitanLegal10 it could still print the document and you could read
it.

Usual disclaimer, these are my own opinions and have nothing to do with
my employer's.

\\ Nick