Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site hplsle.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tikal!hplsla!hplsle!kunz
From: kunz@hplsle.UUCP (kunz)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Re: What kind of gas to use?
Message-ID: <5100001@hplsle.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Mar-85 14:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hplsle.5100001
Posted: Tue Mar 12 14:00:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Mar-85 06:19:07 EST
References: <912@vax1.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:vax1:-91200:hplsle:5100001:000:776
Nf-From: hplsle!kunz    Mar 12 12:00:00 1985


Tom's reponse to this note string demonstrates the basic problem with
the way our government operates... special interest groups.  Tom wants
to tell the EPA that we need lead in our gasoline and they would better
spend their time triing to eliminate tobacco smoke, acid rain....

I would say the EPA should not be influenced by special interests.  If
lead out of all gas would improve the environment, then it is a good thing,
regardless of how it effects special interest groups.  And as speed racer
points out, tetra-ethyl lead is available in concentrated form for those
who *really* nead it.

The essence of the proposed legislation is to keep lead out of cars that
were intended to be run on unleaded.

Bob Kunz
{hplabs!hp-pcd, fluke, teltone}!hplsla!kunz
(206) 335-2135