Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nmtvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!unm-cvax!nmtvax!keaton
From: keaton@nmtvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Re:  Leaded vs. Unleaded?
Message-ID: <360@nmtvax.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Mar-85 15:58:26 EST
Article-I.D.: nmtvax.360
Posted: Sat Mar 16 15:58:26 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Mar-85 02:50:35 EST
References: <496@hou2e.UUCP>
Reply-To: keaton@nmtvax.UUCP (David M. Keaton)
Followup-To: /dev/null
Distribution: net
Organization: New Mexico Tech, Socorro
Lines: 23
Keywords: EPA
Summary: EPA stinks

*** MISPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR BUG. ***

phl@drusd.UUCP (LavettePH) writes:
>Why get upset at the EPA?
> . . .
>If Lundberg is correct again leaded gas would have pretty much have vanished
>from the neighborhood gas station in a year or so even if the EPA had done
>nothing.
>
>- Phil

Wait a minute.  Aren't you forgetting that the EPA is what forced the
use of unleaded in the first place, and thus obsoleted all our
leaded-preferring cars for us?  If the EPA *really* had done nothing, we
wouldn't have that drop in demand for leaded gas!

Environmentalists.  Good grief.
-- 
[Nuke the gay whales.]

                                   David Keaton
                                   New Mexico Tech
                                   ucbvax!unmvax!nmtvax!keaton