Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Professor Wagstaff)
Newsgroups: net.music,net.flame,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.music.gdead
Message-ID: <746@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Mar-85 20:16:57 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.746
Posted: Fri Mar 22 20:16:57 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Mar-85 03:49:46 EST
References: <1196@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Huxley College
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.music:6643 net.flame:8937 net.news.group:2995

> This is a YES vote.
> 
> What I also propose is that all of you deadheads should no longer withhold
> your traffic. Bury this forum if you can, maybe some of the people who oppose
> such change for no discernable reason will change their minds.
> dec-rhea!dec-katadn!bottom

[FLAME ON]
There.  That sounds like a reasoned, thinking person's way of settling the
issue.  It's apparent that at least some of the people supporting the
notion of a separate group seem to be stuck on some sort of childish notion
that having your "own" group offers your musical taste some sort of
"legitimacy" that it wouldn't have otherwise.  ("See, my group has its own
group.  Nyaah.")  As evidenced above.

A warning:  "bury" the forum, and I'm sure it can be arranged that automatic
article posters can "bury" the dead group.  No pun intended.
-- 
Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen.
					Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr