Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aicchi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!aicchi!ignatz From: ignatz@aicchi.UUCP (Ihnat) Newsgroups: net.followup,net.unix Subject: Re: ksh availability Message-ID: <402@aicchi.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Mar-85 18:58:36 EST Article-I.D.: aicchi.402 Posted: Fri Mar 15 18:58:36 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 16-Mar-85 05:30:23 EST References: <10005@ulysses.UUCP> <15757@mgweed.UUCP> Reply-To: ignatz@aicchi.UUCP (David M. Ihnat) Organization: Analysts International Corp; Chicago Branch Lines: 66 Keywords: ksh licensing Xref: watmath net.followup:4661 net.unix:3945 In his article, Randy King apologetically praises Dave's ksh. No apology is needed; it's truly an outstanding product, and deserves whatever praise it gets. While I was on contract at Bell Labs, I used it extensively; now that my contract is over, I miss it intensely. But I do have to take exception with the claim that it's available. Yes, it now can be bought; but, according to the "AT&T Toolchest", which I called just to make sure I'm not mistaken, it's $2000 per site for a source license, and $20000 for a vendor license for object redistribution. Also, not mentioned by the Toolchest, but certified as applicable by another source, is that you must have a System V source license to buy the source. I'm sorry, but I hate to break it to AT&T that most sites don't need or want System V source licenses. Many purchase a machine for which a vendor has done the port; they can afford the object license, but as businesses have neither need, desire, nor cash to buy their own source license--let the vendor fix bugs. Yet, at $20000, the vendors are going to have to charge a substantial sum to recoup their loss on the ksh source. Try to explain to a bursar or comptroller why you want to spend hundreds to thousands of dollars on a new shell--I dare you. The fact of the matter is that, whether we like it or not, it'll be darn hard to justify significant cash expenditure for a tool which will replace a tool which is currently doing the job, be it 'sh' or 'csh'. The same applies for the honey-danber uucp package (which, I was surprised to note, is *not* offered on the Toolchest menu). Apparently, $2000/object license (could someone verify--is that per *machine*, or *organization*? In any case, it's extreme). Again, try to justify that type of cash outlay to an organization which has a tool that works already. Yes, I have to nurse it, watch it, and beat on it--but I'm already doing that, and we're getting our mail and uucp traffic, sooner or later. All of the preceeding totally ignores the fact that the number of Venix- and Xenix-based small Unix(Tm) systems, owned by both individuals and businesses, is huge, and that AT&T is agressively marketing the 3B2. Obviously, the average individual cannot afford a source license, or a $2000 object license, or... Finally, I question the propriety of overcharging in the extreme for the practice of, effectively, offering corrected versions of products which are *already* provided with the existing software, but are so bug-ridden as to be apocryphal. No...I don't think that ksh (or, for that matter, honey-danber uucp) is really available to Unix users yet. As I said before, I applaud the efforts of Dave, Pete, Dan, and Brian; "they done good, real good". And I can understand that it's difficult for AT&T to figure out immediately what is the best marketing strategy, after so many years as a regulated monopoly. But, in the end, I'm the one with a Unix machine at work, and one at home, and can't justify the cash outlay for the tools at work, and can't afford it at home; and that's the bottom line. If it's not affordable, it's not available. Unix is a trademark of AT&T Bell Telephone Laboratories; probably AT&T Toolchest, as well. The opinions expressed herein are solely my own, and in no way necessarily reflect the opinions, attitudes, or policies of my employer. -- Dave Ihnat Analysts International Corporation (312) 882-4673 ihnp4!aicchi!ignatz