Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watarts.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watarts!engl210w2c From: engl210w2c@watarts.UUCP (Bill Switzer) Newsgroups: net.jokes Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: Re: Re: "to be..." with more lines... Doesn't this get a bit ridiculous? Message-ID: <8333@watarts.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Mar-85 17:35:19 EST Article-I.D.: watarts.8333 Posted: Fri Mar 15 17:35:19 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 16-Mar-85 02:35:44 EST References: <271@nmtvax.UUCP> <1055@princeton.UUCP> <625@mhuxt.UUCP> <138@osu-eddie.UUCP> <> <346@nmtvax.UUCP> <252@philabs.UUCP> Reply-To: engl210w2c@watarts.UUCP (Bill Switzer) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 54 Summary: 6 referals to the same article, all including the original article, is a bit much. I have recently subscribed to net.jokes. After slogging through the backlog, the day after, I get the submission below. It's a bit much. Thinking about it, it's also funny! :-) or :-( ? \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ In article <252@philabs.UUCP> vip@philabs.UUCP (V. I. P.) writes: >> >> > > > >> >> > > >To be is to do. >> >> > > > Socrates >> >> > > (I prefer locke for this attribution) >> >> > > > >> >> > > >To do is to be. >> >> > > > Jean-Paul Sartre >> >> > > > >> >> > > >Do be do be do. >> >> > > > Frank Sinatra >> >> > > >> >> > > Do be a Do Bee >> >> > > Romper Room >> >> > > >> >> > > Do Be, or Nod Do Be >> >> > > Hamled >> >> > >> >> > DO-DOO-DOO-DOO, DA-DAA-DAA-DAA...That's all I want to say to you... >> >> > The Police >> >> > >> >> >> >> Yabba Dabba Do! >> >> Fred Flintstone >> >> -- >> > >> >Role me a do-bee >> > A hippie from the sixties >> > >> >Camptown Races Sing My Song DO-DAH DO-DAH >> > Ya got me >> > >> > >> >RRRoollll.... another one... >> > Jist like de other one... >> >> >> Shoo-bee-doo-bee-doo >> madonna >> >> roger >> unmvax!nmtvax!maurice > >Inka-dinka-doo > Jimmy Durante > > E.T. > (The extra testicle)