Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site bu-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!bu-cs!root
From: root@bu-cs.UUCP (Barry Shein)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c,net.wanted
Subject: Re: C compiler for IBM /370 wanted
Message-ID: <251@bu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Mar-85 19:08:01 EST
Article-I.D.: bu-cs.251
Posted: Sat Mar 16 19:08:01 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Mar-85 04:03:04 EST
References: <138@cernvax.UUCP> <244@bu-cs.UUCP>, <9265@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Boston Univ Comp. Sci.
Lines: 13
Xref: linus net.lang.c:4233 net.wanted:5142

[Reference to my reference to RSI 'C' compiler for IBM/370 and warning that
it is lousy]

Just to clarify. I have never used it, I was only guessing when I
assumed it might be good to look at as they used it. We use the
AT&T compiler and are quite happy with it. Thanks to those who
used this RSI 'C' and were able to offer more experienced opinions
than my own. It sounds like it is a loser...call AT&T.

	-Barry Shein, Boston University

[There was also a summary of data-bases in one of the groups and that
seemed to indicate that RSI's ORACLE DB sys is lousy also]