Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site mako.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!mako!seifert
From: seifert@mako.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.mail,net.unix
Subject: Re: Tip for cc or bcc into a file (BSD Mail)
Message-ID: <662@mako.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Mar-85 22:19:16 EST
Article-I.D.: mako.662
Posted: Fri Mar 22 22:19:16 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Mar-85 06:36:48 EST
References: <526@lsuc.UUCP> <1516@watcgl.UUCP>
Reply-To: seifert@mako.UUCP (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 29
Keywords: environment variables
Xref: watmath net.mail:794 net.unix:4024
Summary: 

In article <1516@watcgl.UUCP> (Michael W. Herman) writes:
>> If you're using Berkeley Mail, and you want your cc to go into
>> a file rather than to a user (such as yourself, if all you'll do
>> then is save it in a file), put in the file name with a /, e.g.
>> 	Cc: mail/joe
>
>I use this quite a bit but have complained about the fact that the pathnames 
>are left in the outgoing mail msg.  If the recipient of such a msg replies
>using mail's *reply* command, they also try to mail to a file of the
>same pathname (unless they explicitly remove it from the Cc: line).
>
>Do people think these pathnames should be stripped out of outgoing msgs
>or left in?
>
>p.s. I know I could use Bcc but I don't.

What about the environment variables $folder and $record ?  Also,
look up the 'F' command, as opposed to the 'R' command, and the
-F command line argument.

I definitely miss Berkeley Mail.  :-(  MH-Mail has *major* problems.
        _____
        |___|
       _|___|_               Snoopy
       \_____/          tektronix!mako!seifert
        \___/

If God had intended Man to Smoke, He would have set him on Fire.
                        -the fortune AI project