Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: Re: Nova's Mathematical Mystery Tour (truth of CH)
Message-ID: <9286@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 17-Mar-85 13:48:03 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.9286
Posted: Sun Mar 17 13:48:03 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Mar-85 07:49:11 EST
References: <143@ihlpa.UUCP> <460@petsd.UUCP> <6353@boring.UUCP> <350@talcott.UUCP> <529@mcvax.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 4

> Something that is conceivable to me is that one might come up with new
> axioms for Set Theory that are *obviously* valid and would decide CH.

So, what does category theory have to say about CH?