Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wlbr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!wlbr!steve
From: steve@wlbr.UUCP (Childress)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.16k,net.micro.68k
Subject: FLAME-ON re 24:32 bit addressing
Message-ID: <291@wlbr.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Mar-85 20:34:02 EST
Article-I.D.: wlbr.291
Posted: Tue Mar 12 20:34:02 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Mar-85 05:31:47 EST
Organization: Eaton IMS, Westlake Village, CA
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.micro:9704 net.micro.16k:281 net.micro.68k:671

....

Speaking strictly for myself, I've grown tired of the silly debate on
24/32 bit addresses. Clearly, economics aside, more is better. Cheaper
software is a mandate to us all, lest we be left in the dust by the
hardware state-of-the-art. Today's answer is unconstrained programmers.

And I plead for an end to this ridiculous debate of manucia and history.

		Regards,
			Steve Childress
			Eaton IMS    R&D Group MS 43 
			31717 La Tienda Drive
			Westlake Village,  CA    91360
			(818) 889-2211 X2148
			{trwrb, scgvaxd, ihnp4, voder, vortex} !wlbr!steve
		        or	 		        ...wlbr!wlbreng1!steve