Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aicchi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!aicchi!joeloda From: joeloda@aicchi.UUCP (Joseph D. Loda) Newsgroups: net.micro.apple Subject: News on alternative Apple processors Message-ID: <404@aicchi.UUCP> Date: Sat, 16-Mar-85 15:10:41 EST Article-I.D.: aicchi.404 Posted: Sat Mar 16 15:10:41 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 17-Mar-85 02:42:12 EST Distribution: net Organization: Analysts International Corp; Chicago Branch Lines: 37 Awhile back, I posted a request for information on the use of a 65C02 in an Apple ][+. Thankfully, several good responses were posted. In the latest (March 1985, V8 #3) issue of Call-APPLE, the Apple Doctor column (written by Bruce Field) contained a small article of "other" processors for the ][+. Here are some of the "high points" of the article: - The 65C02 is pin compatible with the 6502, and has 27 additional instructions. - Chips manufactured by different manufacturers are not all the same. For instance, the Rockwell chip has four more instructions dealing with bit manipulation. - A given 65C02 may or may not work in an Apple ][ or ][+. - Two new chips have recently appeared, a 65802 and 65816. These are CMOS chips with 16 bit registers and contain 6502 emulators. - The 65802 is pin compatible with the 6502, and can be used in any Apple. The author notes that hew was told that this chip will work in a //e, but does not know if it will work in the older ][ or ][+ models. (I suspect that this will probably be the same old **** as with the 65C02 for us ][ owners. Wouldn't it be nice if Apple INC. would offer processor upgrade kits?) - The 65816 is not 6502 pin compatible. - The author notes that most of his information came from "Apple Assembly Line", published by S-C Software, PO Box 280300, Dallas, Tx 75228. (BTW, any comments on this newsletter?) -- Joe Loda Analysts International (Chicago Branch) (312) 882-4673 ..!ihnp4!aicchi!joeloda