Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site talcott.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!gjk From: gjk@talcott.UUCP (Greg Kuperberg) Newsgroups: net.misc,net.physics Subject: Re: perpetual motion Message-ID: <368@talcott.UUCP> Date: Tue, 19-Mar-85 01:06:11 EST Article-I.D.: talcott.368 Posted: Tue Mar 19 01:06:11 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 22-Mar-85 02:55:05 EST References: <608@vortex.UUCP> Organization: Harvard Lines: 27 Xref: watmath net.misc:7594 net.physics:2270 > All these stories about miracle inventions being suppressed are usually > just so much rot. I've heard the same story for years about broadcast > power and Tesla. I have yet to see any evidence that it is other than > a fairy tale. > > --Lauren-- While it is certainly true that there is no concrete evidence for perpetual motion machines, the problem with them is really more fundamental. Since a PMM displaces air currents (and to the best of my knowledge, no one has tried to invent a PMM that works only in a vacuum), it must actually create energy instead of simply conserving it. According to Einstein, if you can create energy, you can also create *momentum*. The conservation of momentum is so fundamental (and easy to verify) that even most laymen be- lieve it; this is why there have been so few "momentum creating" machines. Unfortunately, most of the public doesn't know about this implication. Thus these "inventors" are trying to devise a machine which would break a law of physics which *they themselves* accept, although they don't know it. Therefore you don't have to wait to "see some evidence"; you can be almost certain that such people don't know what they are talking about from the moment they mention PMM's. --- Greg Kuperberg harvard!talcott!gjk "No Marxist can deny that the interests of socialism are higher than the interests of the right of nations to self-determination." -Lenin, 1918