Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site ahutb.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!drutx!ahuta!ahutb!leeper From: leeper@ahutb.UUCP (leeper) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: The need for an R-28 rating for films Message-ID: <582@ahutb.UUCP> Date: Sun, 24-Mar-85 16:12:48 EST Article-I.D.: ahutb.582 Posted: Sun Mar 24 16:12:48 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 25-Mar-85 02:57:45 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 82 The following is an editorial I wrote a few months back. I came up again recently and it occurred to me that it might be of some interest to people who read this category: I saw the film JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBERG this recently and enjoyed it a great deal. The question that comes to mind is why are they making so few films of this quality these days. I love fantasy films and this is some sort of Golden Age for fantasy films, but movie-going is getting to be like living on a diet of ice cream and cake. One of the problems is the audiences. If there isn't something enthralling happening on the screen every minute, the yobs and yahoos get restless. They start talking back to the screen and talking to each other (that makes sense because they usually have about the same intelligence as the screen). This is my bid for a new rating system. We don't need a PG-13 rating; we need an R-28. R-28 films wouldn't have more sex or violence than regular R-rated films. They might not have any sex or violence at all. What they would have is some thought content that the producers don't want ruined by the howling mobs. With the current rating system there are enough people who measure films on the same stupid and superficial criteria that the ratings people look at (and really what ratings people look at is what a parent might not want a younger child to see) that a film like INHERIT THE WIND (where Spencer Tracy and Fredric March dramatize the Scopes "Monkey" Trial) could not be made today because it has neither sex nor violence. It would at worst get a PG and more likely a G. G films die at the boxoffice. The majority of the viewing public works on the very sound principle that if the film has nothing in it that a parent would not want a young child to see, then it cannot be worth seeing by anyone but a child. So films with serious points to make, films like WHOSE LIFE IS IT ANYWAY? and FIRST MONDAY IN OCTOBER are forced to bend over backwards to put otherwise unnecessary nudity in or risk death at the boxoffice. NEVER CRY WOLF, one of the best three films of 1983, didn't cave in and it had a relatively short run. If the main character had been studying wolves mating habits rather than their eating habits, it might have stood a chance. Maybe R-28 isn't the answer, but it is a start. Put R-28 films in special theaters that don't show other films. That way attendees to R-28 films wouldn't have to have their feet stick to the floors to see the films. If you have these special theaters in which people could watch serious films in relative comfort, and hear the dialog, you might get a very different cut of the population going to movies in theaters. Exhibitors might rebel, mostly because people over 28 buy less food at the movie. (The impression - 2 - I have is that most of the money a theater makes is at the candy counter. An exhibitor basically sets up a building where the studios can show their films, takes a surprisingly small cut of the studio's profit from this, and then hawks candy to the people that the movie attracts.) Still, films like INHERIT THE WIND cost less to make than JAWS III, so the studio could give the exhibitors a break. And the exhibitor would be catching people who otherwise would only watch a film on a VCR. With an R-28 rating fewer of us would be looking at our cinematic diet of ice cream and cake and asking "Where's the beef?" Mark Leeper ...ihnp4!ahutb!leeper