Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dartvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!dartvax!eg1282
From: eg1282@dartvax.UUCP (eg128 account 2)
Newsgroups: net.music,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.music.dead
Message-ID: <2832@dartvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 13-Mar-85 12:08:30 EST
Article-I.D.: dartvax.2832
Posted: Wed Mar 13 12:08:30 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 15-Mar-85 03:32:20 EST
References: <1060@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.music:6484 net.news.group:2962

> 
> >[btw, I have noticed quite a bit more synth discussion in net.music.synth then
> > was formerly in net.music...  Perhaps the issue of net.music.dead should be
> > raised again...]
> 
> Hear, hear! I support the idea of net.music.dead (or net.music.gdead) as do
> the other deadheads on the net with whom I have spoken. When I read through
> net.music, I am generally looking for Dead-related postings, and would
> prefer not to have to search through mounds of material that is not of
> interest to me (particularly difficult on a VMS system where readnews is 
> not available). Also, I find that deadheads, myself included, greatly 
> enjoy exchanging all kinds of Dead-related information, trivia, and
> anecdotes, which would undoubtedly not be understood nor welcomed
> by the general readership of net.music, and therefore is
> generally not posted. I strongly believe that net.music.gdead would 
> provide a forum for such postings, and increase the number of Dead-related
> discussion, much to the enjoyment of all Deadheads on the net (and probably
> to the relief of some non-Deadheads, poor souls!).
> 
> 
> Seth Jackson
> 
> "We used to play for silver, now we play for life"

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
I'll second that emotion...