Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Lou Reed's past employment
Message-ID: <741@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 21-Mar-85 12:37:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice5.741
Posted: Thu Mar 21 12:37:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Mar-85 03:25:09 EST
References: <8774@brl-tgr.ARPA> <633@pyuxd.UUCP> <721@ccice5.UUCP> <712@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 20

> 
> The comment was supposed to be reflective of how "ancient" history in music
> is unknown to many new listeners, and how now WE are our own parents saying
> "You've never heard of Rudy Vallee?" to us m+n years ago.  If you interpreted
> that as "EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT, STUPID!", I'd say that's your problem.  Why
> didn't you mention the other articles that claimed that the questioner must
> have been from another planet?  Or don't they count?
> -- 
> Life is complex.  It has real and imaginary parts.
> 					Rich Rosen  ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr

If you are going to be this sensitive about comments concerning your postings,
I suggest you reconsider posting at all.  I've been nailed a lot worse than
this on other news groups.  The reply was directed at everyone that had made
rude comments to the questioner.  Your posting was readily available at the
time I felt I should comment.  Are you suggesting I should have inserted the
same reply in every article that had a subject line that read "Lou Reed's 
past employment"?  My employer expects me to work once in a while!

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***