Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!myers
From: myers@uwmacc.UUCP (Jeff Myers)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Proposal for a Peace Network
Message-ID: <802@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Mar-85 17:14:11 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.802
Posted: Sun Mar 17 17:14:11 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Mar-85 03:59:43 EST
References: <143@cornell.UUCP> <5546@ucbvax.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 22

> 
> I hope you don't plan on using DoD funded resources for political
> activities, right or left wing.  Individuals just offering their
> opinion on the net is tolerated by DCA, but this type of activity
> will not be.  In fact, our campus research machines (paid for
> by DARPA or NSF) are not to be used for this purpose, and I would
> suspect CORNELL and many other places would have a similar policy.
> Abuse of this type is what gets written up in 'golden fleece'
> awards, and the network community doesn't need this type
> of publicity.  
> 
> 
> 					Milo

How much rogue or hack do you play, Milo?  Why is political activity less
apropriate than spreading thousands of lines of game source across the
phone lines?  Because the DoD has use for military simulations?

Isn't peace the goal of Defense?  Or should the DoD go back to the more
correct acronym DoW (DOW chemical...hm.)?

jeff m