Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!brian
From: brian@digi-g.UUCP (Brian Westley)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Re: Libertarianism as ideology
Message-ID: <518@digi-g.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Mar-85 11:18:58 EST
Article-I.D.: digi-g.518
Posted: Mon Mar 25 11:18:58 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Mar-85 06:28:19 EST
References: <inmet.2042> <1467@dciem.UUCP> <834@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> <1024@topaz.ARPA>
Reply-To: brian@digi-g.UUCP (brian)
Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <1024@topaz.ARPA> josh@topaz.ARPA (J Storrs Hall) writes:
>...Example:  I have a collection of transistors, capacitors, and so forth,
>on the table in front of me.  I can describe it in terms of each component
>and its relationship to each of the others; or I can describe it as a 
>radio....
>
>--JoSH

This from someone who describes ANY society that kills > 10,000,000 of
it's own people as socialist??  (Gee, I guess any group < 10,000,000 CAN'T
be socialist).  I guess he calls any collection of transistors, capacitors,
etc, a radio, too.  (I am currently typing on a TeleVideo Radio). 
B'goSH, JoSH, your arguments would be more convincing if you used proper
definitions, instead of just making it up as you go along...

Merlyn Leroy
"...a dimension between stupidity and substance, between science and
superficiality, a place we call...The Usenet Zone"